tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post1572724977386461976..comments2023-10-28T08:26:04.665-07:00Comments on A thoughtproduct in the life of...: The Mormon Transhumanist Associationmistahdoomhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10565026922565152435noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-2154290677154716112010-07-29T14:14:42.067-07:002010-07-29T14:14:42.067-07:00Well, if you need somebody to interview Cate Blanc...Well, if you need somebody to interview Cate Blanchett about her secret, I'll volunteer!<br /><br />And I totally forgot about that blog I made. I should start it up again.Shawnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14768178889595666914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-27961293463361864962010-07-27T14:42:16.514-07:002010-07-27T14:42:16.514-07:00Shawn, I just commented on one of your posts! The...Shawn, I just commented on one of your posts! The blog looks a bit dusty. ;) To answer your question, I don't know of any such consensus. Now to my speculation. As to the effects of "immortal" technology, there might indeed be an increase or decrease of the need for population control. There are always and have always been spiritual, ethical, and moral implications to populationBrad Carmackhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10085934989070955986noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-73896650697617338462010-07-26T16:18:36.550-07:002010-07-26T16:18:36.550-07:00Very thought-provoking, Brad. One question (for e...Very thought-provoking, Brad. One question (for either you or Lincoln) - is there a consensus in the transhumanist community regarding the population growth which will occur if technology moves us to the point of immortality, or even an increase of lifespan to 200 or 300 years? At some point won't some kind of population control be required? I see some definite moral, ethical, and Shawnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14768178889595666914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-9452488980975097142010-07-25T20:07:41.090-07:002010-07-25T20:07:41.090-07:00. . . oh, and two name corrections:
Don Bradley
R.... . . oh, and two name corrections:<br /><br />Don Bradley<br />Rob LauerLincoln Cannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08009185417814627678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-15186275443285055752010-07-25T20:05:27.969-07:002010-07-25T20:05:27.969-07:00Brad and Craig, thanks for the enjoyable discussio...Brad and Craig, thanks for the enjoyable discussion.Lincoln Cannonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08009185417814627678noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2847440472042684174.post-87698261523089653102010-07-25T16:14:57.949-07:002010-07-25T16:14:57.949-07:00Great synopsis of our discussion. I'm glad you...Great synopsis of our discussion. I'm glad you took such great notes, it'll make it easier when I sit down and try to remember all this for my wife's benefit... :)Craighttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07241345046897138881noreply@blogger.com